<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Passion is Overrated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nonprofituniversityblog.org/2008/08/passion-is-overrated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nonprofituniversityblog.org/2008/08/passion-is-overrated/</link>
	<description>A blog for the business of nonprofits</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 18:39:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrie Temkin</title>
		<link>http://www.nonprofituniversityblog.org/2008/08/passion-is-overrated/comment-page-1/#comment-653</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrie Temkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 20:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonprofituniversityblog.org/?p=81#comment-653</guid>
		<description>I would identify several criteria when looking for new board members.  My top three:  First, I want someone with a passion for sharing their skills to further the mission.  This is a different entity than passion for the mission.  Someone can know a minimal amount about the organization or its mission but burn to use their skills to make a difference in the community through serving on the board.  (Hopefully, in time they&#039;ll feel passionate about the mission, too.) Second, I want strategic thinkers - people who question, generate options, see the ramifications of decisions.  Third, I want people who not only understand the expectations, but commit to meeting them, fully understanding that they will not retain their board seat if they fail to meet the expectations.  

Terrie Temkin
CoreStrategies for Nonprofits, Inc.
www.CoreStrategies4Nonprofits.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would identify several criteria when looking for new board members.  My top three:  First, I want someone with a passion for sharing their skills to further the mission.  This is a different entity than passion for the mission.  Someone can know a minimal amount about the organization or its mission but burn to use their skills to make a difference in the community through serving on the board.  (Hopefully, in time they&#8217;ll feel passionate about the mission, too.) Second, I want strategic thinkers &#8211; people who question, generate options, see the ramifications of decisions.  Third, I want people who not only understand the expectations, but commit to meeting them, fully understanding that they will not retain their board seat if they fail to meet the expectations.  </p>
<p>Terrie Temkin<br />
CoreStrategies for Nonprofits, Inc.<br />
<a href="http://www.CoreStrategies4Nonprofits.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.CoreStrategies4Nonprofits.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Otten</title>
		<link>http://www.nonprofituniversityblog.org/2008/08/passion-is-overrated/comment-page-1/#comment-647</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Otten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 18:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonprofituniversityblog.org/?p=81#comment-647</guid>
		<description>Laura&#039;s response to Bob:  While I love the written word, I am clearly not sufficiently skilled to allow you to hear my tone and emotions when I write.  I would never, for a moment, wish to reduce board members to automotons dispensing skill in a sterile environment.  Passion for mission has been and always will be one of the chief criterion by which I would judge a board member.  But let&#039;s be clear:  passion alone is not enough to fulfill the responsibilities of a board member.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laura&#8217;s response to Bob:  While I love the written word, I am clearly not sufficiently skilled to allow you to hear my tone and emotions when I write.  I would never, for a moment, wish to reduce board members to automotons dispensing skill in a sterile environment.  Passion for mission has been and always will be one of the chief criterion by which I would judge a board member.  But let&#8217;s be clear:  passion alone is not enough to fulfill the responsibilities of a board member.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob McInnis</title>
		<link>http://www.nonprofituniversityblog.org/2008/08/passion-is-overrated/comment-page-1/#comment-645</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob McInnis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonprofituniversityblog.org/?p=81#comment-645</guid>
		<description>I have sat on many boards, many of which were completely dysfunctional. I agree, passion cannot be the prime selection criteria for appointment to a board. Neither should we reduce the role of board members to a series of specific skills and tasks. The board that I report to now seeks individuals who can engage in a fulsome discussion of a broad number of issues, understand process and then make well reasoned decisions accepting that time and evaluation may prove them wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have sat on many boards, many of which were completely dysfunctional. I agree, passion cannot be the prime selection criteria for appointment to a board. Neither should we reduce the role of board members to a series of specific skills and tasks. The board that I report to now seeks individuals who can engage in a fulsome discussion of a broad number of issues, understand process and then make well reasoned decisions accepting that time and evaluation may prove them wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

